From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-fx0-f220.google.com ([209.85.220.220]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpONG-0006dt-HA for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:03:14 +0100 Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so8461403fxm.12 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:00:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ertHfjbb9NB3+x2C7kBjc/k5Zrm4IAe11SDa6+NSXqc=; b=Wsx1lZcpNECJWtkjSBPep8iiHUWSaWo5BcBhGaYERXPinoaXvynoRdN8sITsgZBCKx evVGvgsMjXuJ7N91MyPE9x5LgkXeWievYuWZROQZ+0paAjUeywxU2Gw6r+bMduUcqgiQ 4ZcOe+ow4OvHMg5nuC8zXz8VnQvrBE2nPo6mI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=IWvpKXwJUv9Xt9bkcZJ7la1wRCqbsjipOuqsn98nFu6cKyW+wfmFhfrGZlt+JJcAYm Aaq3ywqyVmM/3/m+7BF+Oa00ueUHj10bIP4LIvor6+6zxjUcPzPCx13OKFz/XdI5z1nu WKFOmYLEVCaVQxGSa6KtgiwaR9LUc2OMqmCe0= Received: by 10.223.5.75 with SMTP id 11mr1840819fau.46.1268236808967; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:00:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm259730fks.42.2010.03.10.08.00.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:00:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:01:16 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100310160116.GO31945@jama> References: <20100228221056.GG30145@xora-desktop.xora.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.220.220 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] duplicate recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:03:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 04:44:48PM +0100, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > Time for a summary I guess: > > original proposal from me: > Probably the best scenario is to remove all versions which > - are not the latest version > - are not pinned with PREFERRED_VERSION in conf/distro/* > - do not have the largest DEFAULT_PREFERENCE I think this rules are quite strict, in first iteration would be enough to keep only latest from each "major" version where major version is defined by common-sense (ie first 2 version number for xorg, but somewhere first number is enough) ie for xserver-xorg: ../dev/recipes/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg_1.2.0.bb ../dev/recipes/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg_1.3.0.0.bb ../dev/recipes/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg_1.4.2.bb mv ../dev/recipes/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg_1.4.bb mv ../dev/recipes/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg_1.5.1.bb ../dev/recipes/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg_1.5.3.bb mv ../dev/recipes/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg_1.7.1.bb ../dev/recipes/xorg-xserver/xserver-xorg_1.7.4.bb and update preferred-xorg-versions (1.7.1->1.7.4) and other if needed > opinions: JaMa: move older minor versions to obsolete, keep latest for each "major" -- uin:136542059 jid:Martin.Jansa@gmail.com Jansa Martin sip:jamasip@voip.wengo.fr JaMa