From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:20:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Voipac PXA270
In-Reply-To: <20100310133529.GK28972@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
References: <201003100247.27059.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<201003101237.26819.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
	<20100310133529.GK28972@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
Message-ID: <201003101620.17501.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Dne St 10. b?ezna 2010 14:35:29 Daniel Mack napsal(a):
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:37:26PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dne St 10. b?ezna 2010 07:18:40 Mike Rapoport napsal(a):
> > > Do these defines really deserve dedicated .h file? Why cannot they live
> > > in the arch/arm/mach-pxa/vpac270.c?
> >
> > I'm not moving this in. I dont want to polute the .c file with stuff that
> > should obviously go into the header file. Besides there'll be more GPIOs
> > defined and that'd make the .c file less readable, which I want to avoid.
> 
> The question is - are they shared? If they're not and will never be used
> by anything else then this .c file, I'd also vote for not having an
> extra header file for them.
> 
> Daniel
> 
Yes, they are used in the PCMCIA driver. And I'd rather avoid having GPIO 
definitions scattered across multiple files.