From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] remove implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:48:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100311174821.GA5123@x200> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B990496.4020002@kernel.org>
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:56:22PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Lee Schermerhorn was trying to use percpu from slab.h and ran into a
> dependency loop. percpu.h was using slab.h for UP inline
> implementation which isn't a big deal in itself but it turns out that
> percpu.h ends up being included everywhere via module.h and sched.h.
> So, removing that implicit inclusion breaks a lot of files.
>
> The following git tree contains trial conversion on x86_64.
> allmodconfig builds fine on it but a lot of other archs are likely to
> break although fixing them up shouldn't be too hard.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/percpu.git review-remove-implied-slab-inclusion
>
> This can be solved much easier by moving some of the stuff that's
> necessary for slab.h from percpu.h into percpu-defs.h which originally
> got separated so that it can be used by asm/percpu.h but it's hackish
> and for longer term, it would be better to have slab.h explicitly
> included where necessary.
>
> So, what do you guys think? Probably-the-right-thing-to-do >544 file
> patch or somewhat-ugly-but-let's-worry-about-it-tommorrow two file
> patch?
You can include slab.h only for UP case.
Since everyone tests on allmodconfig which has SMP=y, configuration
will be more strict wrt headers, and compile breakages amount
negligible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-11 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-11 14:56 [RFC] remove implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h Tejun Heo
2010-03-11 17:48 ` Alexey Dobriyan [this message]
2010-03-11 22:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-03-16 4:27 ` Tejun Heo
2010-03-16 6:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-16 6:54 ` Tejun Heo
2010-03-16 7:44 ` Tejun Heo
2010-03-16 7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-16 8:32 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-03-16 9:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-03-16 7:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-16 6:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-03-16 7:15 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-03-16 7:56 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-03-16 8:23 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-03-16 9:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-03-16 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-16 7:14 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-03-16 8:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-16 16:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-16 22:57 ` Tejun Heo
2010-03-17 16:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-17 17:14 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2010-03-17 19:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-17 23:00 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100311174821.GA5123@x200 \
--to=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.