From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues. Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:30:45 +0100 Message-ID: <201003151330.45474.arnd@arndb.de> References: <4B947393.2050002@kernel.org> <201003150326.22262.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <4B9DB0F2.7060808@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:49673 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755302Ab0COMbd (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:31:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4B9DB0F2.7060808@zytor.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Denys Vlasenko , Tejun Heo , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , lkml , Daniel Taylor , Jeff Garzik , Mark Lord , tytso@mit.edu, hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp, Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , irtiger@gmail.com, Matthew Wilcox , aschnell@suse.de, knikanth@suse.de, jdelvare@suse.de On Monday 15 March 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > 256K alignment is hard to swallow for a lot of reasons anyway. > > Unless the filesystem packs small files into blocks a-la reiserfs, > > 256K block filesystems will be very inefficient for a typical > > storage scenarios. > > Noone has talked about using 256K filesystem blocks. Well, logfs has just been merged and works with block sizes in that range, but obviously only if the partition is correctly aligned. Arnd