From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Snitzer Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:29:26 -0400 Subject: lv-shared In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20100315192925.GA29389@redhat.com> List-Id: To: lvm-devel@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, Mar 15 2010 at 3:00pm -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > Hi > > Why did you hide the "lv-shared" volume? With this hidden, the size and > percentage can't be seen. You can still see it with: lvs -a I'll have to revisit why I made it hidden (aside from the fact that the associated DM device is also hidden). There was some subtle reason that had to do with the refactoring of associations when I eliminated the distinct ->shared_snapshot pointer (otherwise the vg_validate() method would fail). > Also, your changes to 2.02.62 broke shared store resizing. > lvresize -L 132M vgs/lv-shared no longer works OK, I can have a look but some of my changes also made it so that info-by-uuid based multisnapshot cleanup actually works (needed for lvm2 >= 2.02.62). Mike