From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tino Keitel Subject: Re: Intel X25-M and device-initiated interface power management Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:48:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20100317114823.GA9557@mac.home> References: <20100316220522.GA14120@x61.home> <4BA01E0B.5050906@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eazy.amigager.de ([213.239.192.238]:50616 "EHLO eazy.amigager.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754381Ab0CQLsa (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:48:30 -0400 Received: from mac.home (port-92-206-33-132.dynamic.qsc.de [92.206.33.132]) by eazy.amigager.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3E400FA8008 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:48:28 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BA01E0B.5050906@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 18:10:51 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: [...] > Have a look here: > > http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/How_to_reduce_power_consumption#SATA_Link_Power_Management > > Replace host0, host1, etc. with the appropriate numbers.. I set it to max_performance for all scsi_host sysfs entries, but the DIPM feature in hdparm -I was still shown es enabled. So this can't be the reason for the disabled DIPM I saw in the google hits. Regards, Tino