From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] usb-linux: remove unreachable default in switch statement
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:08:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003171708.04633.paul@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BA105C7.6030806@codemonkey.ws>
> On 03/17/2010 11:14 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:59 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> On 03/08/2010 06:58 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle<pebolle@tiscali.nl>
> >>
> >> Applied. Thanks.
> >
> > Paul Brook was "tempted to replace it by an abort()" (about one and a
> > half week ago). Did you perhaps miss that message or weren't you tempted
> > to do this?
>
> I missed it, but then again, I don't think the patch was wrong in the
> first place.
>
> I think we use too many aborts/exits in the device model that can
> potentially be triggered by guest code.
If something should never happen (as in this case) then an abort/assert is
completely appropriate. Once things get that screwed up there's no right
answer, and the best thing we can do is terminate immediately to try and avoid
further damage.
If an assert/abort can be triggered by a guest then you obviously have a bug.
Removing the assert is not the correct solution. You should either fix
whatever caused the invalid state to occur, or replace it with an appropriate
retry, fallback or guest visible failure.
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-17 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-08 12:58 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] usb-linux: remove unreachable default in switch statement Paul Bolle
2010-03-08 13:31 ` Paul Brook
2010-03-17 15:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-03-17 16:14 ` Paul Bolle
2010-03-17 16:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-03-17 17:08 ` Paul Brook [this message]
2010-03-17 17:15 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-03-17 17:43 ` Paul Brook
2010-03-17 20:15 ` Blue Swirl
2010-03-17 20:41 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-03-17 20:56 ` Paul Bolle
2010-03-17 20:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-03-17 21:05 ` Blue Swirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003171708.04633.paul@codesourcery.com \
--to=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.