From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-3.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.123] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsByt-0007aw-B9 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:25:31 +0000 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]) by sfi-mx-3.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1NsBys-0006vA-B2 for ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:25:31 +0000 Received: from d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.107]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o2I9Ip21009056 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:18:51 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay05.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o2I9PMN4068788 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:25:23 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o2I9PM2b032078 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:25:22 -0600 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:55:16 +0530 From: Rishikesh K Rajak Message-ID: <20100318092516.GA16328@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20100302152135.GA6691@us.ibm.com> <20100302173535.GA14556@us.ibm.com> <5EEDD2C4-6C6C-4008-81AA-65B78FA3E7C8@gmail.com> <20100303055619.GA19084@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <364299f41003030114x30e251d6x7cd7993f8f75792f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <364299f41003030114x30e251d6x7cd7993f8f75792f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LTP] LTP's filecaps test gives false positive results List-Id: Linux Test Project General Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-list-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Garrett Cooper Cc: Rishikesh K Rajak , "ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net" , Iranna D Ankad On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:14:12AM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Yes -- and I think this is because the constants no longer have > the same name: > > http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/include/linux/prctl.h?v=linux-2.6#L68 > > Note -- CAP_BSET_DROP should be: PR_CAPBSET_DROP, etc. > > Which is why I stress _not_ putting these hardcoded constants in > test files (POLLHDRDUP -- or whatever it was in ppoll01 -- is the only > real violation I can remember OTOH that I need to clean up > eventually). We need to be consistent with any and all documentation > provided to end-developers or we [LTP] are going to shoot ourselves in > the foot if and when the underlying functionality changes. > I'll update the tests this weekend, but I would like it if someone > test the tests on an outdated distro (RHEL 4.x?) once I provide a Hi Garret, Can you please look this again ? -Rishi > patch to ensure that nothing's being regressed. Based on some really > simple inspection it appears that these tests are compatible only with > libcapability 2.x+, but I could be wrong... > Thanks, > -Garrett > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list