From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Multiple remotes without conflicts
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:07:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100318190712.GD10981@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1268913163.git.agruen@suse.de>
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de> wrote:
> I'm still trying to find a simple and painless way of sharing the object
> store among multiple repositories: the idea is to have a "parent"
> repository which contains the actual object store, and a number of
> "child" repositories which link to that object store. The obvious
> problem is garbage collection: we can only garbage collect the parent
> once it has all refs of all its children.
>
> One way of ensuring that is to make each child a "remote" of the parent,
> and to fetch all remotes first. This works for branches, but not for
> tags or for the reflog.
This just feels like the wrong solution.
Why can't we have a "$GIT_DIR/children" subdirectory with a symlink
or file-containing-path to each child repository. Modify the fsck
and gc paths to include these additional reference and reflog spaces,
and that's that.
Child registration is then just a matter of installing the symlink
in the parent, or removing it, and gc/fsck never needs to worry
about a fetch up front in order for it to be accurate.
--
Shawn.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-18 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 11:52 [PATCH 0/9] Multiple remotes without conflicts Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-13 17:17 ` [PATCH 1/9] fetch: Check for a "^{}" suffix with suffixcmp() Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-12 22:27 ` [PATCH 2/9] fetch: Properly initialize refspec on stack Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-15 22:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] fetch: Fix minor memory leak Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-16 15:45 ` [PATCH 4/9] fetch: Move deepening fetch check into builtin/fetch.c Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-16 17:49 ` [PATCH 5/9] fetch: Move loop checking which refs we have already Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-16 18:48 ` [PATCH 6/9] fetch: Check if all objects exist after fetching Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-17 21:42 ` [PATCH 7/9] fetch: Use the same ref map for all branches and tags Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-17 23:02 ` [PATCH 8/9] fetch: Don't fetch tags twice Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-17 23:59 ` [PATCH 9/9] fetch: Make automatic tag following work with arbitrary refspecs Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-18 19:08 ` [PATCH 6/9] fetch: Check if all objects exist after fetching Shawn O. Pearce
2010-03-18 19:36 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-03-18 19:07 ` Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
2010-03-18 19:42 ` [PATCH 0/9] Multiple remotes without conflicts Andreas Gruenbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100318190712.GD10981@spearce.org \
--to=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.