All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: mgross@linux.intel.com
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, 640E9920 <640e9920@gmail.com>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwalker@codeaurora.org,
	tiwai@suse.de, bruce.w.allan@intel.com, aili@codeaurora.org,
	khilman@deeprootsystems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM_QOS updates for 2.6.34-rc1
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:49:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003192049.34665.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100319143055.GA6124@linux.intel.com>

On Friday 19 March 2010, mark gross wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 07:26:37AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Sat 2010-03-13 16:34:25, 640E9920 wrote:
> > > The following patch series implements to following:
> > > 1) pm_qos now uses a handle based implementation.  No more string
> > > compares while walking lists.
> > > 2) renames the exports to using more accurate names.
> > > 3) updates kernel clients of pm_qos per this change
> > > 4) added ascii interface to pmqos recognizing strings formatted in 10
> > > charactor format "0x12345678"
> > > 5) added new pm_qos class, "system_bus_throughput"
> > > 
> > > I would like to see this series make it into 2.6.34 if its not too late. 
> > 
> > I believe it is... -rc1 is past us.
> 
> crap.  I'll guess I'll redo them for next then.
> 
> 
>  
> > Also... the way the patches are structured... that will break bisect,
> > no?
> 
> Um not sure, how would you recomend I structure them?

Generally speaking, the kernel should build and should work correctly after
applying each consecutive patch in the series.

Rafael

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-19 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-14  0:34 [PATCH] PM_QOS updates for 2.6.34-rc1 640E9920
2010-03-14  6:26 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-14 20:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-14 20:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-19 14:30   ` mark gross
2010-03-19 19:49     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-03-19 19:49     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-03-19 19:52       ` Daniel Walker
2010-03-19 19:52       ` Daniel Walker
2010-03-19 14:30   ` mark gross
2010-03-14  6:26 ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-14  0:34 640E9920

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201003192049.34665.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=640e9920@gmail.com \
    --cc=aili@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
    --cc=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.