From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751424Ab0CSTrA (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:47:00 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:54748 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751197Ab0CSTq7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:46:59 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: mgross@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM_QOS updates for 2.6.34-rc1 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:49:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.34-rc1-rjw; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Pavel Machek , 640E9920 <640e9920@gmail.com>, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwalker@codeaurora.org, tiwai@suse.de, bruce.w.allan@intel.com, aili@codeaurora.org, khilman@deeprootsystems.com References: <20100314003425.GA17812@mgross-acer> <20100314062637.GA12064@elf.ucw.cz> <20100319143055.GA6124@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20100319143055.GA6124@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003192049.34665.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 19 March 2010, mark gross wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 07:26:37AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Sat 2010-03-13 16:34:25, 640E9920 wrote: > > > The following patch series implements to following: > > > 1) pm_qos now uses a handle based implementation. No more string > > > compares while walking lists. > > > 2) renames the exports to using more accurate names. > > > 3) updates kernel clients of pm_qos per this change > > > 4) added ascii interface to pmqos recognizing strings formatted in 10 > > > charactor format "0x12345678" > > > 5) added new pm_qos class, "system_bus_throughput" > > > > > > I would like to see this series make it into 2.6.34 if its not too late. > > > > I believe it is... -rc1 is past us. > > crap. I'll guess I'll redo them for next then. > > > > > Also... the way the patches are structured... that will break bisect, > > no? > > Um not sure, how would you recomend I structure them? Generally speaking, the kernel should build and should work correctly after applying each consecutive patch in the series. Rafael