From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sencha.khimov.ru ([89.223.109.22]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsjTX-0000ea-6d for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:11:29 +0100 Received: from [93.100.16.104] (helo=mate.localnet) by sencha.khimov.ru with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsjQU-000473-6M; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:08:15 +0300 From: Roman I Khimov To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:05:35 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31.12-0.1-desktop; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <201003182212.31873.roman@khimov.ru> <201003190004.37865.roman@khimov.ru> <201003190023.36525.roman@khimov.ru> In-Reply-To: <201003190023.36525.roman@khimov.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201003200005.35468.roman@khimov.ru> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 89.223.109.22 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: roman@khimov.ru X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Perl 5.10.1 and a bunch of modules X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:11:29 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 17879 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6960124.vSJjLNErtN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart6960124.vSJjLNErtN Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =C2 =F1=EE=EE=E1=F9=E5=ED=E8=E8 =EE=F2 =CF=FF=F2=ED=E8=F6=E0 19 =EC=E0=F0= =F2=E0 2010 00:23:25 =E0=E2=F2=EE=F0 Roman I Khimov =ED=E0=EF=E8=F1=E0=EB: > =C2 =F1=EE=EE=E1=F9=E5=ED=E8=E8 =EE=F2 =CF=FF=F2=ED=E8=F6=E0 19 =EC=E0=F0= =F2=E0 2010 00:04:30 =E0=E2=F2=EE=F0 Roman I Khimov =ED=E0=EF=E8=F1=E0=EB: > > =C2 =F1=EE=EE=E1=F9=E5=ED=E8=E8 =EE=F2 =D7=E5=F2=E2=E5=F0=E3 18 =EC=E0= =F0=F2=E0 2010 23:47:01 =E0=E2=F2=EE=F0 Roman I Khimov=20 =ED=E0=EF=E8=F1=E0=EB: > > > No. You mean, this one? > > > http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=3Dca5f36ee6ad756e1e= 5402 > > >88 a5 6a504c1d8ecc7a3 > > > > > > Looks like a good thing to have, so if Richard will push it to OE.dev= I > > > can do a rebase of my patchset. > > > > Actually, the better sequence is > > * drop 5.8.4 and 5.8.7 > > * bring in staging changes > > * bring in 5.10.1 > > > > I'll prepare 5.8.4/5.8.7 removal patch. >=20 > Updated rik/perl-5.10 branch with removal patch, please ACK. Tried to compile for arm, succeeded with perl, discovered and fixed some=20 problems in modules. Updated the branch. I think I need some ACK's for dusty old Perl versions removal and then=20 Richard's Perl staging update could be merged better on top of that (CC'ing= =20 Richard) and than I'll update 5.10.1 to new staging and push the series. At= =20 least, that's how I think it should be. If there are any problems with stag= ing=20 update and it's not ready to be pushed in OE.dev, I think we can merge 5.10= =2E1=20 as it is now. =2D-=20 http://roman.khimov.ru mailto: roman@khimov.ru gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3 --nextPart6960124.vSJjLNErtN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkuj5x8ACgkQXJ70z+XgVcMXSACgkLGRdVrqiSJe6SiXotaj/nX6 7qoAoK8/Db7ulMAxE9U9PqOHfvm+8W2d =5I7l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6960124.vSJjLNErtN--