All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	Calvin Walton <calvin.walton@gmail.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ssb: Implement virtual SPROM on disk
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:28:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003222328.40703.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BA7ED0A.9060804@lwfinger.net>

On Monday 22 March 2010 23:19:54 Larry Finger wrote:
> On 03/22/2010 04:55 PM, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > 
> > I don't see a problem for udev to distinguish the cards. It can do it merely on
> > the bus-ID. That's unique. Yeah, it might change if you change the hardware.
> > But do we care? I say no, because you cannot actually change the hardware in real life
> > for any of these devices. And even if you could reorder the devices on the bus or whatever.
> > What would happen? The card would get a new MAC address. That's all. That's acceptable.
> > 
> > The kernel would (for example) just set the mac address to all-ones. Udev would
> > notice this (invalid) mac address and reassign a new persistent one to the device. It then
> > stores the address on the harddisk.
> 
> What ensures that this persistent name would be unique?

The same mechanism that ensures that an UUID is unique: A good random number generator.

> > In fact, if we implement a mechanism in the kernel, we have _exactly_ the same problem.
> > However, currently Larry's patches just ignore that problem and assume that there's only
> > one card in the system anyway.
> 
> As I said in a posting a few minutes ago, that problem is solved.

Well. You distinguish by bus-ID, right? That's exactly the thing that udev does.

-- 
Greetings, Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-22 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-21 23:22 [PATCH V2] ssb: Implement virtual SPROM on disk Larry Finger
2010-03-22  6:28 ` Calvin Walton
2010-03-22  8:37   ` Michael Buesch
2010-03-22 15:06     ` Larry Finger
2010-03-22 21:55       ` Michael Buesch
2010-03-22 22:19         ` Larry Finger
2010-03-22 22:28           ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2010-03-22 21:56   ` Larry Finger
2010-03-22 22:25     ` Michael Buesch
2010-03-22 23:45       ` Larry Finger
2010-03-23  8:52         ` Michael Buesch
2010-03-23 14:25           ` Larry Finger
2010-03-23 20:58             ` Calvin Walton
2010-03-23 22:02               ` Michael Buesch
2010-03-24 14:16               ` Larry Finger
2010-03-24 19:21                 ` Michael Buesch
2010-03-26  3:47                   ` Larry Finger
2010-03-28 17:14                     ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2010-03-28 17:14                       ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2010-03-28 18:25                       ` Larry Finger
2010-03-28 18:25                         ` Larry Finger
2010-03-28 19:04                         ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2010-03-28 19:04                           ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2010-03-29  0:33                           ` Larry Finger
2010-03-29  0:33                             ` Larry Finger
2010-03-29  2:06                             ` Peter Stuge
2010-03-29  2:21                               ` Gene Heskett
2010-03-29  2:43                                 ` Larry Finger
2010-03-29  7:44                                   ` Stefano Brivio
2010-03-29  8:00                                     ` David Woodhouse
2010-03-29 12:39                                     ` Gene Heskett
2010-03-30 22:21                                       ` Peter Stuge
2010-03-30 22:34                                         ` Gene Heskett
2010-03-24  1:25       ` Ehud Gavron
2010-03-23  8:55     ` Florian Fainelli
2010-03-23 11:43       ` Michael Buesch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201003222328.40703.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
    --cc=calvin.walton@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.