From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4338836192398328030=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont <remi@remlab.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] PPP Patches v3
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:34:39 +0200
Message-ID: <201003231434.39439.remi@remlab.net>
In-Reply-To: <1269310920.4851.32.camel@localhost.localdomain>
List-Id: <ofono.ofono.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org

--===============4338836192398328030==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tuesday 23 March 2010 04:22:00 Marcel Holtmann, you wrote:
> If you have variables that are only valid inside the scope of a
> statement, then I prefer if you only declare them there. This makes the
> code a bit simpler to read. Check the patch I just pushed to give you an
> example.

If you're serious about that, you should turn on C99 support. Only then you =

can use C++-style for-loops.

-- =

R=C3=A9mi Denis-Courmont

--===============4338836192398328030==--