From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: - fix-mtd-cfi-lpddr-flash-driver-huge-latency-bug.patch removed from -mm tree Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:40:11 -0700 Message-ID: <20100323154011.7abb9f60.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <201003232219.o2NMJVcm029198@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <20100323233326.73366j7ufi3kol9y@mail.your-server.de> Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:42470 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753349Ab0CWWkz (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:40:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100323233326.73366j7ufi3kol9y@mail.your-server.de> Sender: mm-commits-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org To: stefani@seibold.net Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, michael.kreuzer@nsn.com, nico@fluxnic.net, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:33:26 +0100 stefani@seibold.net wrote: > > Zitat von akpm@linux-foundation.org: > > > > > The patch titled > > mtd: CFI/LPDDR flash driver: fix huge latency bug > > has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was > > fix-mtd-cfi-lpddr-flash-driver-huge-latency-bug.patch > > > > This patch was dropped because of linux-next bitrot and struct mutex > > mutex[1] weirness > > > > Sorry but i did not understand. What does bitrot mean? Other changes in linux-next caused it to break. > And where was the problem with mutex[1]? It caused warnings because your various calls to mutex_init() didn't handle it correctly. It's unconventional and odd - don't bother with it.