From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips.
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:34:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201003241534.01219.rob@landley.net> (raw)
I have a native build under qemu that gets killed if it doesn't produce a line
of output for 60 seconds (hang detection enforced by the host monitoring
qemu's stdout with --nographic, not from within qemu).
In the most recent release version, it never came close to triggering on mips
with a 30 second timeout. In the current -git version (well, as of Thursday
anyway), it triggers frequently (about 90% of the time) even with a 60 second
timeout.
I bisected it to this:
commit 1828be316f6637d43dd4c4f5f32925b17fb8107f
Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Mar 10 11:38:41 2010 +0100
more alarm timer cleanup
The timer_alarm_pending variable is related to the alarm timer but not
placed in the struct. Also, in qemu_mod_timer the wrong flag was being
tested: the timer is rearmed in the alarm timer "bottom half", so the
right flag to test there is the "pending" flag.
Finally, I hoisted the NULL checks from alarm_has_dynticks to
host_alarm_handler.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Reverting that patch fixed it (git show HEAD | patch -R -p1), by which I mean
three consecutive runs with 30 second timeout didn't trigger the hang
detection.
Unfortunately, I can't revert that patch in current origin/master because most
of the hunks fail...
Help?
Rob
--
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds
next reply other threads:[~2010-03-24 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-24 20:34 Rob Landley [this message]
2010-03-25 9:20 ` [Qemu-devel] Significant performance regression in qemu-system-mips Artyom Tarasenko
2010-03-25 17:33 ` Rob Landley
2010-03-25 23:25 ` Aurelien Jarno
2010-03-25 23:57 ` Alexander Graf
2010-03-26 2:44 ` Rob Landley
2010-04-01 13:49 ` Andreas Färber
2010-04-01 23:42 ` Alexander Graf
2010-04-02 8:56 ` Aurelien Jarno
2010-04-03 5:49 ` Rob Landley
2010-03-26 9:53 ` Rob Landley
2010-03-26 19:00 ` Aurelien Jarno
2010-03-26 21:47 ` Rob Landley
2010-03-27 12:32 ` Aurelien Jarno
2010-03-27 23:01 ` Rob Landley
2010-03-28 14:57 ` Aurelien Jarno
2010-03-28 18:40 ` Rob Landley
2010-03-28 16:33 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2010-04-01 21:33 ` [Qemu-devel] " Aurelien Jarno
2010-04-03 4:58 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201003241534.01219.rob@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.