From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Ben Blum <bblum@google.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] sched/cpusets fixes, more changes are needed
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:10:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100325161008.GA11724@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100325160243.GA11517@redhat.com>
Argh, sorry for noise...
On 03/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 03/25, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > I like the current idea to call select_task_rq() without rq->lock, but
> > of course this is up to you.
> >
> > However, once again, can't we make a simpler patch?
> >
> > - remove PF_STARTING from task_waking()
> >
> > - change sched_fork() to set RUNNING instead of WAKING
When I reread this thread, suddenly finally I noticed you mentioned
_twice_ your patch does this too ;) Not to mention the patch itself
which I misread. Sorry.
> IOW, something like the (unchecked, uncompiled) patch below.
Still, what do you think?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-25 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-15 9:09 [PATCH 0/6] sched/cpusets fixes, more changes are needed Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-24 17:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-24 18:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-25 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-25 15:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-25 16:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-03-25 16:10 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-03-25 17:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-25 19:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100325161008.GA11724@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=bblum@google.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.