All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
To: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	davem@sunset.davemloft.net
Subject: Re: Question about e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 -- [IPV4]: The scheduled removal of multipath cached routing support.
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:21:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100325172137.GA12751@elliptictech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d460de71003251011y2d8d1931u683b396f40df4ed1@mail.gmail.com>

On 18:11 Thu 25 Mar     , Richard Hartmann wrote:
> I was wondering what the rationale for commit
> e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 is. We upgraded our custom
> image to 2.6.33 recently and found those options to be missing.

>From the diff of that commit:

-What:	Multipath cached routing support in ipv4
-When:	in 2.6.23
-Why:	Code was merged, then submitter immediately disappeared leaving
-	us with no maintainer and lots of bugs.  The code should not have
-	been merged in the first place, and many aspects of it's
-	implementation are blocking more critical core networking
-	development.  It's marked EXPERIMENTAL and no distribution
-	enables it because it cause obscure crashes due to unfixable bugs
-	(interfaces don't return errors so memory allocation can't be
-	handled, calling contexts of these interfaces make handling
-	errors impossible too because they get called after we've
-	totally commited to creating a route object, for example).
-	This problem has existed for years and no forward progress
-	has ever been made, and nobody steps up to try and salvage
-	this code, so we're going to finally just get rid of it.
-Who:	David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)

      reply	other threads:[~2010-03-25 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-25 17:11 Question about e06e7c615877026544ad7f8b309d1a3706410383 -- [IPV4]: The scheduled removal of multipath cached routing support Richard Hartmann
2010-03-25 17:11 ` Richard Hartmann
2010-03-25 17:21 ` Nick Bowler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100325172137.GA12751@elliptictech.com \
    --to=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
    --cc=davem@sunset.davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richih.mailinglist@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.