From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sirius.lasnet.de ([78.47.116.19]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvHOW-00011W-TT for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:48:47 +0100 Received: from p5b036e7d.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.3.110.125] helo=excalibur) by sirius.lasnet.de with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1NvHLQ-0001Bk-RI by authid with cram_md5 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:45:35 +0100 Received: from stefan by excalibur with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NvHLP-0005WI-QQ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:45:31 +0100 Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:45:31 +0100 From: Stefan Schmidt To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100326214531.GC18337@excalibur.local> References: <974C3B6C9F0A4A43918BACCA33390AC270D44F345A@mail.microsol.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <974C3B6C9F0A4A43918BACCA33390AC270D44F345A@mail.microsol.ie> X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-KeyID: 0xDDF51665 X-Website: http://www.datenfreihafen.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.19 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stefan@datenfreihafen.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: twin-image & orpheus patch for gcc 4.3 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:48:47 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello. On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 15:09, Lucian Ion wrote: > > I couldn't build twin-image today. > > Then I found this patch: > http://bugs.gentoo.org/61223 > > I've attached the solution to fix the problem. > > orpheus-gcc-3.4.patch Sorry for the very late reply. I just stumpled over it in our patchwork setup. The patch you sent is going to be applied directly to orpheus. What we would need for OE is a patch that adds it into our tree and modifies the recipe to apply it. Care to resend such a patch? regards Stefan Schmidt