From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: move some code from macro to function
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 21:15:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100328041554.GQ2343@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BAEC91E.8000001@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:12:30AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
> cleanup: move some code from macro to function
Nice!
I have queued this for RCU 2.6.35, with the following commit message:
Shrink the RCU_INIT_FLAVOR() macro by moving all but the
initialization of the ->rda[] array to rcu_init_one().
The call to rcu_init_one() can then be moved to the end
of the RCU_INIT_FLAVOR() macro, which is required because
rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(), which is now called from
rcu_init_one(), depends on the initialization of the ->rda[]
array.
Seem reasonable?
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 3ec8160..112edb5 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1849,6 +1849,14 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rnp->blocked_tasks[3]);
> }
> }
> +
> + rnp = rsp->level[NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1];
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> + if (i > rnp->grphi)
> + rnp++;
> + rsp->rda[i]->mynode = rnp;
> + rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(i, rsp);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1859,19 +1867,11 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> #define RCU_INIT_FLAVOR(rsp, rcu_data) \
> do { \
> int i; \
> - int j; \
> - struct rcu_node *rnp; \
> \
> - rcu_init_one(rsp); \
> - rnp = (rsp)->level[NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1]; \
> - j = 0; \
> for_each_possible_cpu(i) { \
> - if (i > rnp[j].grphi) \
> - j++; \
> - per_cpu(rcu_data, i).mynode = &rnp[j]; \
> (rsp)->rda[i] = &per_cpu(rcu_data, i); \
> - rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(i, rsp); \
> } \
> + rcu_init_one(rsp); \
> } while (0)
>
> void __init rcu_init(void)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-28 4:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-28 3:12 [PATCH] rcu: move some code from macro to function Lai Jiangshan
2010-03-28 4:15 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-03-29 1:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100328041554.GQ2343@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.