From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vms173013pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.13]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwB4g-0003U5-LZ for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:15:59 +0200 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.251.58.177]) by vms173013.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0L0100I19DOUDOI1@vms173013.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 04:14:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6377614AF60; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:12:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:12:28 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20100329091228.GA4123@denix.org> MIME-version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 206.46.173.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: denis@denix.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: openssl-native is broken? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:15:59 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline Is openssl-native broken for anyone else, when built from scratch? I think the conversion to new style staging was not complete/correct for the -native part. Koen, can you please check it? Thanks. -- Denys