From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754861Ab0C2Qrw (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:47:52 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:44718 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754845Ab0C2Qrv (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:47:51 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:47:38 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes Message-ID: <20100329164738.GA3527@elte.hu> References: <20100326154354.GA10959@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=none autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ingo, what's the state of the "fix CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM=y" patches? I've seen > the patches several times, but I've been expecting to pull them from the > -tip tree rather than apply them directly. Thanks, i missed their .34 relevance and was concentrating too much on the whole series ... > It's mainly the "avoid infinite loop" thing, but Yinghai seems to think the > three first patches of his (currently 31-patch) series are all 2.6.34 > material. > > Ping? I'm on them now - just applied the three patches & tidied up the changelogs - will send them later today or tomorrow at the latest after some testing (if you dont beat me to it). Thanks, Ingo