From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
David Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 1/2] PPC64-HWBKPT: Disable interrupts for data breakpoint exceptions
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:49:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100330101908.GC14734@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269927145.7101.48.camel@pasglop>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 04:32:25PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 16:24 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 07:37:02PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> >
> > > Index: linux-2.6.ppc64_test/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.ppc64_test.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
> > > +++ linux-2.6.ppc64_test/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
> > > @@ -735,6 +735,9 @@ _STATIC(do_hash_page)
> > > std r3,_DAR(r1)
> > > std r4,_DSISR(r1)
> > >
> > > + andis. r0,r4,0x0040 /* Data Address Breakpoint match? */
> >
> > Minor comment: why not DSISR_DABRMATCH@h instead of 0x0040?
> >
> > > + bne- handle_dabr_fault
> > > +
> > > andis. r0,r4,0xa450 /* weird error? */
> > > bne- handle_page_fault /* if not, try to insert a HPTE */
> > > BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
> > > @@ -823,6 +826,15 @@ END_FW_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(FW_FEATURE_ISER
> > > bl .raw_local_irq_restore
> > > b 11f
>
> I would move your new test to the "weird error" case (ie, after the bne-
> handle_page_fault) to avoid hitting the fast path.
>
Done that...so basically the branch to handle_page_fault will happen
only if 0xa410 matches.
The changes can be seen here: linuxppc-dev: message-id:
20100330095925.GB14403@in.ibm.com.
Thanks,
K.Prasad
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-30 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20100323140008.954823303@pr>
2010-03-23 14:07 ` [RFC Patch 1/2] PPC64-HWBKPT: Disable interrupts for data breakpoint exceptions K.Prasad
2010-03-30 5:24 ` Paul Mackerras
2010-03-30 5:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-30 10:19 ` K.Prasad [this message]
2010-03-30 10:17 ` K.Prasad
2010-03-23 14:07 ` [RFC Patch 2/2] PPC64-HWBKPT: Implement hw-breakpoints for PPC64 K.Prasad
2010-03-26 21:11 ` Dave Kleikamp
2010-03-29 11:31 ` K.Prasad
2010-03-29 19:53 ` Dave Kleikamp
2010-03-30 10:12 ` K.Prasad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100330101908.GC14734@in.ibm.com \
--to=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=dwg@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.