From: "Ira W. Snyder" <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (adm1031) Increase update rate
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:56:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100330225628.GE20635@ovro.caltech.edu> (raw)
The adm1031 chip is capable of an 8 Hz update rate, configurable at runtime
with the fan filter register. Increase the update rate to get faster
temperature readings.
Signed-off-by: Ira W. Snyder <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>
---
This may be a bit controversial. The ADM1031 chip may use more power at a
higher update rate. In my (embedded) application, this doesn't matter. The
faster update rate is more important.
Does anyone have thoughts on this? It is easy enough for me to carry
myself, but I'd much rather have it upstream.
Ira
drivers/hwmon/adm1031.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/adm1031.c b/drivers/hwmon/adm1031.c
index 1644b92..c7195cc 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/adm1031.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/adm1031.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#define ADM1031_REG_FAN_DIV(nr) (0x20 + (nr))
#define ADM1031_REG_PWM (0x22)
#define ADM1031_REG_FAN_MIN(nr) (0x10 + (nr))
+#define ADM1031_REG_FAN_FILTER (0x23)
#define ADM1031_REG_TEMP_OFFSET(nr) (0x0d + (nr))
#define ADM1031_REG_TEMP_MAX(nr) (0x14 + 4 * (nr))
@@ -919,6 +920,9 @@ static void adm1031_init_client(struct i2c_client *client)
ADM1031_CONF1_MONITOR_ENABLE);
}
+ /* Increase the ADC sampling rate -- temperatures update at 8 Hz */
+ read_val = adm1031_read_value(client, ADM1031_REG_FAN_FILTER);
+ adm1031_write_value(client, ADM1031_REG_FAN_FILTER, read_val | 0x1C);
}
static struct adm1031_data *adm1031_update_device(struct device *dev)
@@ -929,7 +933,7 @@ static struct adm1031_data *adm1031_update_device(struct device *dev)
mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
- if (time_after(jiffies, data->last_updated + HZ + HZ / 2)
+ if (time_after(jiffies, data->last_updated + HZ / 8)
|| !data->valid) {
dev_dbg(&client->dev, "Starting adm1031 update\n");
--
1.5.4.3
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next reply other threads:[~2010-03-30 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-30 22:56 Ira W. Snyder [this message]
2010-04-05 7:46 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon: (adm1031) Increase update rate Jean Delvare
2010-04-05 17:51 ` Ira W. Snyder
2010-04-06 8:39 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100330225628.GE20635@ovro.caltech.edu \
--to=iws@ovro.caltech.edu \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.