From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing policy->walk.dead Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:54:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20100331.135427.149457693.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1270042795.26743.31.camel@bigi> <1270042883.26743.32.camel@bigi> <20100331135629.GD14082@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, timo.teras@iki.fi, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:41126 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932141Ab0CaUyZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:54:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100331135629.GD14082@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Herbert Xu Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:56:29 +0800 > This is inconsistent with the behaviour of SADB flushes, and the > spirit of RFC2367. Want to have an even larger list of areas where we're not compliant with that RFC2367 that everyone has to extend and makes changes to in order to be useful? :-) Herbert, you have to show that something breaks because of this, because the new behavior helps in diagnosis and efficiency and the old behavior has been a serious pet peeve of mine just as it was for Jamal.