From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] module.h: add stub for is_module_percpu_address Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:29:09 +1030 Message-ID: <201003312329.09722.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20100330191834.f2009292.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4BB2358B.3090800@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:40618 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757348Ab0CaM7M (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:59:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BB2358B.3090800@oracle.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Tejun Heo On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:01:55 am Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap > > Fix build for CONFIG_MODULES not enabled by providing a stub > for is_module_percpu_address(). > > kernel/lockdep.c:605: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_module_percpu_address' > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap Acked-by: Rusty Russell Thanks! Rusty.