From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8035153617600675229==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Denis Kenzior Subject: Re: Access to SIM card when Modem is not "Powered" Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:09:28 -0500 Message-ID: <201004011009.28487.denkenz@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1270125842.2432.273.camel@phoenix.elisa-laajakaista.fi> List-Id: To: ofono@ofono.org --===============8035153617600675229== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Aki, > to, 2010-04-01 kello 11:14 +0200, ext Pekka Pessi kirjoitti: > > It seems to me that Marcel and Aki want to control TX power with the > > Powered property. (BTW, there already is a post-sim mechanism to > > control the RX/TX, namely Register/Deregister.) > = > But then Register()'s meaning is overloaded to mean both RF on *and* > (automatically) register. This doesn't work in the manual registration > case, where after landing on the other side of the Atlantic, you first > need to turn RF on, then select a roaming partner from a list. I agree, Register is not the right one here. > = > In fact, Deregister() is currently not all that useful, and not even > implemented in isimodem. I think it should simply be removed. I'm actually fine removing it since most modems end up not supporting this = either. Regards, -Denis --===============8035153617600675229==--