All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keld Simonsen <keld@keldix.com>
To: Learner Study <learner.study@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, keld@dkuug.dk
Subject: Re: Linux Raid performance
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 13:05:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100402110506.GA16294@rap.rap.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <g2s7efa8a7d1004012007ibe8b42b6k28a6d2a531fb6103@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:07:25PM -0700, Learner Study wrote:
> Hi Keld:
> 
> Do we have raid5/6 numbers for linux on any multi-core CPU? Most of
> the benchmarks I have seen on wiki show raid5 perf to be ~150MB/s with
> single core CPUs. How does that scale with multiple cores? Something
> like intel's jasper forest???

I have not checked if the benchmarks were on multi core machines. 
It should not matter much if there were more than one CPU, but
of cause it helps a little. bonnie++ test reports cpu usage, and this
is not insignificant, say in the 20 -60 % range for some tests,
but nowhere near a bottleneck. There was one with a raid5 performance
seq read of about 500 MB/s with 36 % cpu utilization, so it is
definitely possible to come beyound 150 MB/s. The speed is largely
dependent on number of disk drives you employ.


> If available, can u pls point me to numbers with multi-core CPU?

I dont have such benchmarks AFAIK. But new benchmarks are always welcome,
so please feel free to submit your findings.

Best regards
keld

> Thanks!
> 
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Keld Simonsen <keld@keldix.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:42:57PM -0700, Learner Study wrote:
> >> Hi Linux Raid Experts:
> >>
> >> I was looking at following wiki on raid perf on linux:
> >>
> >> https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Performance
> >>
> >> and notice that the performance numbers are with 2.6.12 kernel.
> >>
> >> Do we perf numbers for:
> >> - latest kernel (something like 2.6.27 / 2.6.31)
> >> - raid 5 and 6
> >>
> >> Can someone please point me to appropriate link?
> >
> > The link mentioned above has a number of other performance reports, for other levels of the kernel.
> > Anyway you should be able to get comparable results for newer kernels, the kernel has not become
> > slower since 2.6.12 on RAID.
> >
> > best regards
> > Keld
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-02 11:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-31 19:42 Linux Raid performance Learner Study
2010-03-31 20:15 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02  3:07   ` Learner Study
2010-04-02  9:58     ` Nicolae Mihalache
2010-04-02 17:58       ` Learner Study
2010-04-02 11:05     ` Keld Simonsen [this message]
2010-04-02 11:18       ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 17:55       ` Learner Study
2010-04-02 21:14         ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 21:37           ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 11:20             ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-03 15:56               ` Learner Study
2010-04-04  1:58                 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-03  0:10           ` Learner Study
2010-04-03  0:39         ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-03  1:00           ` John Robinson
2010-04-03  1:14           ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03  1:32             ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-03  1:37               ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03  3:06                 ` Learner Study
2010-04-03  3:00             ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 19:27               ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03 18:14             ` MRK
2010-04-03 19:56               ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-04 15:00                 ` MRK
2010-04-04 18:26                   ` Learner Study
2010-04-04 18:46                     ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-04 21:28                       ` Jools Wills
2010-04-04 22:38                         ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-05 10:07                           ` Learner Study
2010-04-05 16:35                             ` John Robinson
2010-04-04 22:24                       ` Guy Watkins
2010-04-05 13:49                         ` Drew
2010-04-04 23:24                   ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 11:20                     ` MRK
2010-04-05 19:49                       ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 21:03                         ` Drew
2010-04-05 22:20                           ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 23:49                           ` Roger Heflin
2010-04-14 20:50             ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100402110506.GA16294@rap.rap.dk \
    --to=keld@keldix.com \
    --cc=keld@dkuug.dk \
    --cc=learner.study@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.