From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pete Zaitcev Subject: Re: [Patch 1/3] CLD: End-to-end verbosity Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:22:16 -0600 Message-ID: <20100406232216.223c6445@redhat.com> References: <20100331184302.6ec6e69c@redhat.com> <4BBB47E1.1080901@garzik.org> <20100406213231.45939ce5@redhat.com> <4BBC0BD0.6080304@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BBC0BD0.6080304@garzik.org> Sender: hail-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Project Hail List On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:36:32 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: > On 04/06/2010 11:32 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:40:33 -0400 > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >> The debug levels are > >> > >> 0: key messages affecting server operation, only > >> 1: debugging output enabled, sans per-packet output > >> 2: debugging output enabled, including per-packet output > > > > The previous patch did just that: > > Why did you reject it? > > That's a damned good question. I have no idea. Did I ever reply to > that patch? It looks like I fscked up and missed it? Apparently no reply (by e-mail): http://marc.info/?l=hail-devel&m=126575343714155&w=2 I recall you said that "users hate bitmasks" on IRC or in other thread, so I thought that -D and -v would be right (effectively a bitmask but no hexadecimal at least). -- Pete