From: Eric Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Raymond <esr@snark.thyrsus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] "status --ignored"
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:41:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100410144149.GA23959@thyrsus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100410084007.GA16843@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:48:49AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> >
> > > + dir.flags |= DIR_COLLECT_IGNORED;
> >
> > I thought about using collect-ignored so that fill_directory() does not
> > have to be run twice, but IIRC it can short-circuit an entire directory
> > using the "simplify" logic (as it was designed to be used for "git add"),
> > no?
>
> Hmm. I didn't consider that. It may be sufficient to say "foo/ is
> ignored" and let callers decide for themselves that "foo/bar" is
> ignored, too (unless, of course, it appears as tracked earlier in the
> list).
Speaking as a front-end author, I would prefer that all ignored paths
be listed so I don't have to do globbing.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-10 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-09 18:46 git status --porcelain is a mess that needs fixing Eric Raymond
2010-04-09 20:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-04-10 4:09 ` Jeff King
2010-04-10 5:46 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-04-10 5:51 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-04-10 6:03 ` Jeff King
2010-04-10 6:12 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-04-10 6:32 ` Jeff King
2010-04-10 5:59 ` Eric Raymond
2010-04-10 7:40 ` [PATCH 0/5] "status --ignored" Junio C Hamano
2010-04-10 7:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] wt-status: remove unused workdir_untracked field Junio C Hamano
2010-04-10 7:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] wt-status: plug memory leak while collecting untracked files Junio C Hamano
2010-04-10 7:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] wt-status: collect ignored files Junio C Hamano
2010-04-10 7:48 ` Jeff King
2010-04-10 7:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] wt-status: rename and restructure status-print-untracked Junio C Hamano
2010-04-10 7:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] status: --ignored option shows ignored files Junio C Hamano
2010-04-10 7:44 ` [PATCH 0/5] "status --ignored" Jeff King
2010-04-10 7:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-04-10 8:40 ` Jeff King
2010-04-10 14:41 ` Eric Raymond [this message]
2010-04-10 18:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-04-10 19:20 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-04-11 10:35 ` Jeff King
2010-04-10 13:35 ` git status --porcelain is a mess that needs fixing Julian Phillips
2010-04-10 14:43 ` Eric Raymond
2010-04-10 14:56 ` Jon Seymour
2010-04-10 15:50 ` Julian Phillips
2010-04-10 23:33 ` Jon Seymour
2010-04-10 19:25 ` [RFC/PATCH] status: Add a new NUL separated output format Julian Phillips
2010-04-10 19:50 ` Eric Raymond
2010-04-10 20:34 ` Julian Phillips
2010-04-10 21:12 ` Eric Raymond
2010-04-10 23:03 ` [RFC/PATCH] status: Add json " Julian Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100410144149.GA23959@thyrsus.com \
--to=esr@thyrsus.com \
--cc=esr@snark.thyrsus.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.