From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1O0hfo-0006CH-1l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:53:00 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49685 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O0hfm-0006BM-Nt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:52:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1O0hfl-0008V3-JS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:52:58 -0400
Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([88.191.82.174]:38387)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <aurelien@aurel32.net>) id 1O0hfl-0008Uk-DE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:52:57 -0400
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 22:52:55 +0200
From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for 0.12.4
Message-ID: <20100410205255.GP17204@hall.aurel32.net>
References: <20100408183706.GA6046@volta.aurel32.net>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1004102206550.11532@bbs.intern>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1004102206550.11532@bbs.intern>
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@wiesinger.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:08:45PM +0200, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> A number of fixes have been accumulated in the stable-0.12 branch, and
>> I think it's time to release a new stable version. I would like to see
>> that happening for the end of next week (around the 18th of April).
>>
>> If you want to see some patches included, please send a mail to the
>> mailing list with the [STABLE] tag. I would clearly prefer patches that
>> are already in HEAD (if the patch can simply be cherry-picked, there is
>> no need to send a patch, just the commit number), though other patches
>> might be considered too.
>>
>
> Would be nice to backport the SCSI "crash&boot" patches. (was recently on 
> the list, if you need more infos let me know, already commited).
>

Can you please point me to the corresponding patches? Do they apply
directly to stable?

-- 
Aurelien Jarno	                        GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net