All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/10] xfs: fix min bufsize bugs in two places
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:32:48 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100412063248.GG2493@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270852013.7840.132.camel@doink>

On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:26:53PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> This fixes a bug in two places that I found by inspection.  In
> xlog_find_verify_cycle() and xlog_write_log_records(), the code
> attempts to allocate a buffer to hold as many blocks as possible.
> It gives up if the number of blocks to be allocated gets too small.
> Right now it uses log->l_sectbb_log as that lower bound, but I'm
> sure it's supposed to be the actual log sector size instead.  That
> is, the lower bound should be (1 << log->l_sectbb_log).
> 
> Also define a simple macro xlog_sectbb(log) to represent the number
> of basic blocks in a sector for the given log.
> 
> (No change from original submission; I have implemented Christoph's
> suggestion about storing l_sectsize rather than l_sectbb_log in
> a new, separate patch in this series.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
> 
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c |   21 +++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ STATIC void	xlog_recover_check_summary(x
>  	((bbs + (log)->l_sectbb_mask + 1) & ~(log)->l_sectbb_mask) : (bbs) )
>  #define XLOG_SECTOR_ROUNDDOWN_BLKNO(log, bno)	((bno) & ~(log)->l_sectbb_mask)
>  
> +/* Number of basic blocks in a log sector */
> +#define xlog_sectbb(log) (1 << (log)->l_sectbb_log)
> +

Can you do this without the #define? There's a spot in
xlog_alloc_log() where the l_sectbb_mask is set up that
open code this shift, so it seems to me that this woul dbe the spot
to set up a l_sect_size variable and reference that instead...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-13  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-09 22:26 [PATCH 2/10] xfs: fix min bufsize bugs in two places Alex Elder
2010-04-12  6:32 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2010-04-13  5:12   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100412063248.GG2493@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=aelder@sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.