From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Cameron Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:18:50 +0000 Subject: Re: why cbcp option is not in the pppoe request packet Message-Id: <20100412101850.GA15892@us.netrek.org> List-Id: References: <28215364.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <28215364.post@talk.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 02:06:27AM -0700, Mondayfox wrote: > I tried to connet to win2003 RAS with linux redhat5,but failed. > After capturing packets , I found there was no cbcp option in the packet . But the peer accepted the host's rejection of CBCP, so CBCP is not required. What makes you think CBCP is required? Is the peer configured to callback? The debug log shows LCP termination request from the peer immediately after the host sends an EAP response. Are you sure you wish to authenticate to the peer using EAP? Have you tried "refuse-eap" option? -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/