From: Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Al Chu <chu11-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [infiniband-diags] [0/3] support --diff and --diffcheck in ibnetdiscover
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:08:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100413130803.GG10830@me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270659929.26381.38.camel-RLKWKRZIcZkVVsCFsIUZTRy+HRzXvqW9@public.gmane.org>
Hi Al,
On 10:05 Wed 07 Apr , Al Chu wrote:
>
> Others on the list may wonder how this is different than just using the
> normal 'diff' tool. The differences I can think of are:
>
> 1) This checks differences in the network, not text. This is
> particularly important when lids, lmc, etc. are changed. Otherwise
> there are many differences in a normal diff output that aren't
> necessary.
>
> 2) This provides the appropriate "context" in the diff output, showing
> the appropriate system ids to allow a system administrator to identify
> ports on what switch have changed. Under normal diff output, you may
> not get that appropriate context of information. The system
> administrator can of course use options like --context in diff, but the
> goal is to make the diff output clear and concise, not outputting
> unnecessary junk.
>
> 3) As parallelization has been added into ibnetdisocver/libibnetdiscover
> this becomes more critical as output in ibnetdiscover/libibnetdiscover
> can be re-ordered. So a normal diff suddenly is non-functional.
I'm getting your arguments. And this remind me the question which was
already raised some time ago.
Would it be better to keep cache in a regular human readable
ibnetdiscover output format, so '--diff' will be usable not just against
cache, but also against a regular ibnetdiscover output files?
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-13 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-07 17:05 [infiniband-diags] [0/3] support --diff and --diffcheck in ibnetdiscover Al Chu
[not found] ` <1270659929.26381.38.camel-RLKWKRZIcZkVVsCFsIUZTRy+HRzXvqW9@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-13 13:08 ` Sasha Khapyorsky [this message]
2010-04-13 13:10 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2010-04-13 17:17 ` Al Chu
[not found] ` <1271179075.17987.94.camel-X2zTWyBD0EhliZ7u+bvwcg@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-14 9:54 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100413130803.GG10830@me \
--to=sashak-smomgflxvozwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=chu11-i2BcT+NCU+M@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.