From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm test: Add 32-bit task switch micro-test
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:22:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100414172241.GE18132@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BC5CD5E.6000608@siemens.com>
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 04:12:46PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gleb, you might want to have a look at this test. When using it with my
> 2.6.34 queue (or below or with QEMU), I get the following, expected
> output:
>
> fault at 8:4002ef, prev task 18, error code 1234
> post fault
>
> When using it with master + my error-code patch, I get this:
>
> fault at 8:4002ef, prev task 18, error code 1234
>
> post fault
>
> I.e. there is blank line, a repeated 0x0a character after returning from
> the fault handler. I'm suspecting that IO string rework triggers this.
> Instrumentation of the testdev showed that the spurious puts() was
> emitted over the instruction that the fault handler returns to. Any
> ideas?
>
Yes, handle_task_switch() needlessly exits to userspace without setting
exit reason, so last exit reason is reused (in your test case this is io write).
This patch should fix the problem:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index bffd049..d080840 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -4740,7 +4740,7 @@ int kvm_task_switch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 tss_selector, int reason)
if (ret == X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
kvm_x86_ops->set_rflags(vcpu, vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt.eflags);
- return (ret != X86EMUL_CONTINUE);
+ return (ret == X86EMUL_CONTINUE);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_task_switch);
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-14 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-14 14:12 [PATCH] kvm test: Add 32-bit task switch micro-test Jan Kiszka
2010-04-14 14:37 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-04-14 14:41 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-04-14 14:46 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-04-14 17:22 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2010-04-14 19:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-04-15 16:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100414172241.GE18132@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.