From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2ksj-0004gJ-No for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:42:50 +0200 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1037504fgg.6 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:39:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=rxcs63CcdjT5WNr7VBhWut0DtGjLBLrgcN4uR2IJ7+A=; b=k8IZAmKkHD3UUR/rC+JAR8zaVV6vhnDBxDFpb5SRHcTeMmiZ2WViKTZfG0tWSY5AAW TLTxIIPK4FT3/SHxyEUx9MUndeg255TY3gL0DJghF4SJn06HWUyQDWoHRZ+8kTaOHppE UaUdRxh7n2A4Wb9d15nKDJzNMcAwkT+qzDcVQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; b=MgsjioBYvyPw1L5NJYdm2KkphIdwrG17YfZsXB2j3sYNudYAoTGgoQhWN7W09rzn6l vkY+ETCn4jYtopMKyUYSAOwbuv111sHKQB1FCU0bK++ufYdpHUFNyjs+d4X2i01m7p1e Gwpsmg9UyVbyqwB7TCEwSPYlxlzTgxHhjZM5c= Received: by 10.87.2.15 with SMTP id e15mr1325439fgi.23.1271421561795; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b17sm3624545fka.43.2010.04.16.05.39.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 16 Apr 2010 05:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:39:20 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100416123920.GB3323@jama> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 72.14.220.153 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Do we really want shared Xserver script for all machines? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:42:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, on Openmoko Freerunner om-gta02 Xserver script takes about 3s on every boot http://build.shr-project.org/tests/jama/bootchart-2.6.32.9.r1.png it's started from /etc/init.d/xserver-nodm and with eliminated Xserver call by passing xinit call directly with right Xorg params I get this http://build.shr-project.org/tests/jama/bootchart-2.6.32.9.r3.png My question is: should I commit simplified versions of Xserver script xserver-kdrive-common/xserver-kdrive-common/Xserver to xserver-kdrive-common/xserver-kdrive-common/om-gta02/Xserver and the same for other devices supported in Xserver (to save grep,awk call). or do it only for om-gta02 (maybe even in xserver-kdrive-common/xserver-nodm-init/xserver-nodm ) and those who care about boot time will follow? Maybe calling fallback_screen_arg only where it's really needed would be good enough optimization, without the cost of loosing PACKAGE_ARCH = "all". Cheers, -- uin:136542059 jid:Martin.Jansa@gmail.com Jansa Martin sip:jamasip@voip.wengo.fr JaMa