All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Tony Vroon <tony@linx.net>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff - bug?
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:00:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004162000.29861.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100414075808.GA4202@tiehlicka.suse.cz>

On Wednesday 14 April 2010, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 13-04-10 22:53:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 April 2010, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Tue 13-04-10 01:01:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 10 April 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > On Friday 09 April 2010, Tony Vroon wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 22:42 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > Please check if the patch below changes anything.
> > > > > > >  drivers/acpi/wakeup.c |    4 ++--
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > That didn't change the behaviour for me, sorry.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Well, I would be sorry if it did, because the patch removed some useful code. :-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > > (I made sure to go through a full power down session before trying the
> > > > > > patched kernel)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks for testing.  So it looks like we don't disable the GPE during power off.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I'll try to figure out what's going on, please stay tuned.
> > > > 
> > > > Can you please check if the patch below changes the behavior?
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately, it didn't help either (I have tried on top of the fresh
> > > rc4).
> > 
> > That gets really weird.
> > 
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/acpi/wakeup.c |    6 +++---
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> > > > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> > > > @@ -63,17 +63,17 @@ void acpi_enable_wakeup_device(u8 sleep_
> > > >  	list_for_each_safe(node, next, &acpi_wakeup_device_list) {
> > > >  		struct acpi_device *dev =
> > > >  			container_of(node, struct acpi_device, wakeup_list);
> > > > +		u8 action = ACPI_GPE_ENABLE;
> > 
> > Can you try to change the above to ACPI_GPE_DISABLE and retest, please?
> 
> Unfortunately didn't help as well...
> Just for reference:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c b/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> index 248b473..f23c08f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/wakeup.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ void acpi_enable_wakeup_device(u8 sleep_state)
>  	list_for_each_safe(node, next, &acpi_wakeup_device_list) {
>  		struct acpi_device *dev =
>  			container_of(node, struct acpi_device, wakeup_list);
> -		u8 action = ACPI_GPE_ENABLE;
> +		u8 action = ACPI_GPE_DISABLE;

That probably means the chipset enables the GPEs by itself _after_ we've
disabled them in acpi_enable_wakeup_device().

Unfortunately, I can't reproduce the issue on any of my test boxes and it's
hard to find the source of the problem staring at the code.

Rafael

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-16 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-01 13:39 commit 9630bdd9 changes behavior of the poweroff - bug? Michal Hocko
2010-04-01 13:45 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-04-01 13:53   ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-02 19:31     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-07  7:34       ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-07 19:49         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-08  9:49           ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-08 20:43             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-08 20:43             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-08 22:37               ` Tony Vroon
2010-04-08 22:54                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-08 22:54                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-08 22:37               ` Tony Vroon
2010-04-09 20:42               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-09 21:20                 ` Tony Vroon
2010-04-10 19:36                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-12 23:01                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-13  8:27                       ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-13  8:27                       ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-13 20:53                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-13 20:53                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-14  7:58                           ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-16 18:00                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-04-19 11:59                               ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-19 15:19                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-25  2:35                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-25  2:35                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-25  3:15                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-25  3:15                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-26 15:05                                     ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-26 15:05                                     ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-26 16:22                                       ` Len Brown
2010-04-26 16:22                                       ` Len Brown
2010-04-27  7:04                                         ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-27  7:04                                         ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-29 14:38                                         ` Tony Vroon
2010-04-29 14:38                                           ` Tony Vroon
2010-04-26 18:51                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-27  6:51                                         ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-27  6:51                                         ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-27 22:06                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-28 21:18                                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-28 21:18                                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-27 22:06                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-26 18:51                                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-19 15:19                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-19 11:59                               ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-16 18:00                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-14  7:58                           ` Michal Hocko
2010-04-12 23:01                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-12 23:01                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-10 19:36                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-09 21:20                 ` Tony Vroon
2010-04-09 20:42               ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201004162000.29861.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=tony@linx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.