From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2sXk-0005ng-45 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:53:42 +0200 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1232251fgg.6 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:50:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=+DAnHDOBFL/z5tPs8EHZihJEs8lyzHxRJk2wIyQunZ0=; b=v2pp9AC/C18tmfWzyX88vQrpBogw5PtvydhvaNilON8s1YLoikGFu7i+luAlu/WisE Q7tuu+WPD/iejvmF5BdvCSu+QcIdWRfqNVaQxOejgS0ZCLyQVdL4XZVsAKEFzB9xuswo WpkVwa7Fl5CN+KC8HJyOimGztS6TNsW3y3yfA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=pFSA+mkcAwPd7u2146/PeTJnfvPgzxi0QB9+3s+V8W4t4BjD9lVr2lvs3ymIKsF1IA g0++6usMCC3ZZ6rAnyxGIL0WKlDaA3QHymytBDlVRFOimufbhrqxBpm/I/YQy9PR6uE5 6BCjI7brKt/ASBSbMEjUU78JWcYIhZ46jOBJo= Received: by 10.223.98.19 with SMTP id o19mr947531fan.80.1271451011602; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm4753262fks.22.2010.04.16.13.50.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:50:11 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20100416205011.GC3323@jama> References: <20100416123920.GB3323@jama> <201004161541.23250.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201004161541.23250.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 72.14.220.156 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Do we really want shared Xserver script for all machines? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:53:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 03:41:22PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > I did send RFC about it on 3rd August 2009. Merged it into stable/2009 in > October 2009 as we used it on BUG 1.x and 2.0 devices. > > So far I did not noticed anyone using it. For those which use I guess this is because task-x11-utils pulls xserver-kdrive-common unconditionaly.. I've added variable there for distro to pick provider easily and after some test I'll send it for review. > xserver-nodm-init script to boot into root X11 session: you need newer > version from BugLabs repository: > > svn://svn.buglabs.net/bug/trunk/com.buglabs.build.oe/meta-bug/packages/xserver-nodm-init In patch I have now, I renamed old version to 1.0 and added version from buglabs as 2.0 with D_P -1. Not best solution as it allows people to use old xserver-kdrive-common + this newer nodm-init, but comment above D_P setting should be enough for maintainers to notice. Thanks hrw, pity that we overlooked xserver-common for so long.. Regards, -- uin:136542059 jid:Martin.Jansa@gmail.com Jansa Martin sip:jamasip@voip.wengo.fr JaMa