From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752558Ab0DSWEZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:04:25 -0400 Received: from cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.21.11]:52912 "HELO outbound-mail-01.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751891Ab0DSWEY (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:04:24 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=XAeaC3Um3zJ56L/advvZpM1TgEqz6mHQhr6A01SKz6yYUh5+1/nBjGljuV/Xr7vX3s7cWJGPQluK5iSnLmS/TW6EY6Zlq9RNqF4on4nrcJKRzSiVmPxANzZ5rAC4AmyI; Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:05:32 -0700 From: Jesse Barnes Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Dave Airlie , James Simmons Subject: Re: [RFC] Try a bit harder to get output on the screen at panic time Message-ID: <20100419150532.13822b73@virtuousgeek.org> In-Reply-To: <20100409151050.74ef6dcd@virtuousgeek.org> References: <20100409151050.74ef6dcd@virtuousgeek.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.110.194.140 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:10:50 -0700 Jesse Barnes wrote: > This set of 3 patches makes it a little more likely we'll get panic > output onto the screen even when X is running, assuming a KMS enabled > stack anyway. > > It gets me from a blank or very sparsely populated black screen at > panic time, to one including the full backtrace and panic output at > panic time (tested with "echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger" from an X > session). > > It doesn't cover every case; for instance I think it'll fail when X has > disabled the display, but those cases need to be handled with separate > patches anyway (need to add atomic DPMS paths for instance). > > Anyway, please test these out and let me know if they work for you. Linus, did you get a chance to try these at all? They're small, and if they work for you I thought maybe they had a chance to get into 2.6.34. Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [RFC] Try a bit harder to get output on the screen at panic time Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:05:32 -0700 Message-ID: <20100419150532.13822b73@virtuousgeek.org> References: <20100409151050.74ef6dcd@virtuousgeek.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from outbound-mail-01.bluehost.com (cpoproxy1-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5ACC09E910 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:04:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100409151050.74ef6dcd@virtuousgeek.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Torvalds , Linus@freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:10:50 -0700 Jesse Barnes wrote: > This set of 3 patches makes it a little more likely we'll get panic > output onto the screen even when X is running, assuming a KMS enabled > stack anyway. > > It gets me from a blank or very sparsely populated black screen at > panic time, to one including the full backtrace and panic output at > panic time (tested with "echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger" from an X > session). > > It doesn't cover every case; for instance I think it'll fail when X has > disabled the display, but those cases need to be handled with separate > patches anyway (need to add atomic DPMS paths for instance). > > Anyway, please test these out and let me know if they work for you. Linus, did you get a chance to try these at all? They're small, and if they work for you I thought maybe they had a chance to get into 2.6.34. Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center