All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Tom Lyon" <pugs@cisco.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	joerg.roedel@amd.com, chrisw@sous-sol.org, dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c: errors with smaller iommu widths
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:43:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100419154339.e80b6ef3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bccceb0.P4o49QIX47z1ouTs%pugs@cisco.com>

On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:44:16 -0700
"Tom Lyon" <pugs@cisco.com> wrote:

> 
> When using iommu_domain_alloc with the Intel iommu, the domain address width
> is always initialized to 48 bits (agaw 2). __This domain->agaw value is then
> used by pfn_to_dma_pte to (always) build a 4 level page table. __However, not
> all systems support iommu width of 48 or 4 level page tables. __In particular,
> the Core i5-660 and i5-670 support an address width of 36 bits (not 39!), an
> agaw of only 1, and only 3 level page tables.
> 
> This version of the patch simply lops off extra levels of the page tables if
> the agaw value of the iommu is less than what is currently allocated for the
> domain (in intel_iommu_attach_device). If there were already allocated
> addresses above what the new iommu can handle, EFAULT is returned.
> 	Signed-off-by: Tom Lyon <pugs@cisco.com>

This smells like a 2.6.34 patch.  Do you agree?

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-19 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-19 21:44 [PATCH v3] drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c: errors with smaller iommu widths Tom Lyon
2010-04-19 22:43 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-04-19 22:47   ` Tom Lyon
2010-04-19 22:52   ` Chris Wright

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100419154339.e80b6ef3.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pugs@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.