From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Egger Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] Nested Virtualization: p2m cleanup Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 11:35:00 +0200 Message-ID: <201004201135.00940.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> References: <201004151429.36196.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> <201004201120.27066.Christoph.Egger@amd.com> <20100420092918.GM31304@whitby.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100420092918.GM31304@whitby.uk.xensource.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Tim Deegan Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tuesday 20 April 2010 11:29:18 Tim Deegan wrote: > At 10:20 +0100 on 20 Apr (1271758826), Christoph Egger wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 April 2010 11:12:32 Tim Deegan wrote: > > > At 08:41 +0100 on 20 Apr (1271752877), Christoph Egger wrote: > > > > On Friday 16 April 2010 12:45:35 Tim Deegan wrote: > > > > > Nacked pending performance eval. > > > > > > > > > > BTW, if perf turns out not be a problem, I welcome this with open > > > > > arms; always nice to see a patch that removes a lot of code. > > > > > > > > kernbench performance numbers on 64bit xen: > > > > > > Looking good. :) > > > > Yes. > > > > > What was the guest? > > > > SLES10SP3 > > 64bit, HVM? yes. > > > > And what about 32bit Xen? > > > > I provide the numbers when I have them. > > Thanks. > > Tim. -- ---to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Andrew Bowd, Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632