From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>
Cc: Scott Feldman <scofeldm@cisco.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next,1/2] add iovnl netlink support
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:19:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004201819.32970.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100420152206.GA24942@x200.localdomain>
On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann (arnd@arndb.de) wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 April 2010, Chris Wright wrote:
> >
> > After thinking some more about this case, I now believe we should do
> > it the other way around, and have lldpad in control of this interface
> > from the user space side, and letting user programs (lldptool, libvirt,
> > ...) talk to lldpad in order to set it up.
>
> lldpad won't be involved in all cases, yet a mgmt tool like libvirt will.
> so this seems backwards.
Well, that part is still the matter of this discussion, as far as I can tell ;-)
> > But that's only the case if the NIC itself is in VEPA mode. If that
> > were the case, there would be no need for a kernel interface at all,
> > because then we could just drive the port profile selection from user
> > space.
> >
> > The proposed interface only seems to make sense if you use it to
> > configure the NIC itself! Why should it care about the port profile
> > otherwise?
>
> In the case of devices that can do adjacent switch negotiations directly.
I thought the idea to deal with those devices was to beat sense into
the respective developers until they do the negotiation in software 8-)
> > > > Same here: Should you be able to set multiple MAC addresses, or
> > > > trunk mode? Can the VF override it?
> > > > Also, for the new multi-channel VEPA, I'd guess that you also need
> > > > to supply an 802.1ad S-VLAN ID.
> > >
> > > Something like set_port_profile() would initiate the negotiation for the
> > > s-vlan id for a particular channel, not sure it's needed as part of the
> > > netlink interface or not.
> >
> > Well, you have to set up the s-vlan ID in order to have something to
> > set the port profile in.
>
> Right, depends if the use the port profile to establish the channel and
> negotiate the s-vlan ID. I don't recall the order there.
I'm pretty sure that setting up the channel (for 802.1bg) is done before
any port profile comes in.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-20 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-19 19:18 [net-next PATCH 0/2] iovnl netlink ops + enic dynamic vnics Scott Feldman
2010-04-19 19:18 ` [net-next PATCH 1/2] add iovnl netlink support Scott Feldman
2010-04-20 13:48 ` [net-next,1/2] " Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-20 14:34 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-20 14:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-20 15:22 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-20 16:19 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2010-04-20 20:26 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-21 13:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-21 16:28 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-21 18:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-20 19:56 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-21 11:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-21 11:42 ` Selective MD5 Checksum Failuers Bijay Singh
2010-04-21 16:18 ` [net-next,1/2] add iovnl netlink support Chris Wright
2010-04-21 17:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-21 18:10 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-21 19:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-21 20:25 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-21 21:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-21 22:48 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-22 6:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-22 17:47 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-22 18:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-22 19:02 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-22 19:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-22 21:03 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-21 23:54 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-22 12:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-22 7:09 ` David Miller
2010-04-21 22:18 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-22 0:01 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-21 21:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-22 6:48 ` [net-next PATCH 1/2] " David Miller
2010-04-22 21:23 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-22 23:04 ` David Miller
2010-04-22 23:16 ` eSwitch management Anirban Chakraborty
2010-04-23 0:47 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-23 1:29 ` Scott Feldman
2010-04-23 5:57 ` Anirban Chakraborty
2010-04-23 12:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-23 16:23 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-23 19:00 ` Anirban Chakraborty
2010-04-23 19:44 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-23 21:08 ` Anirban Chakraborty
2010-04-23 23:04 ` Chris Wright
2010-04-24 6:21 ` Anirban Chakraborty
2010-04-22 6:52 ` [net-next PATCH 1/2] add iovnl netlink support David Miller
2010-04-22 10:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-22 10:56 ` David Miller
2010-04-22 11:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-19 19:18 ` [net-next PATCH 2/2] add enic iovnl ops for dynamic vnics Scott Feldman
2010-04-19 21:35 ` [net-next PATCH 0/2] iovnl netlink ops + enic " Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201004201819.32970.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scofeldm@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.