All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qemu-kvm: Ask kernel about supported svm features
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:28:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100422122802.GA28773@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BD03D5A.6090905@redhat.com>

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:13:14PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/22/2010 03:02 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:

>> We can't just take the host-cpuid
>> because most of the additional svm features need special emulation in
>> the kernel. Or do you think this should better be handled in
>> target-i386/cpuid.c?
>>    
>
> Yes.  -cpu host should take KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID output and loop it  
> back to the vcpu configuration, others just take the qemu configuration,  
> mask it with supported bits, and pass it back (see  
> check_features_against_host()).

Hmm, the plan was to enable with -enable-nesting all kernel supported
svm features for the guest (and add switches later to remove them
individually)
If we activate nested svm with -cpu host in the future thats fine too
(closed-source hypervisors need that anyway). But we should also define
a cpu model in which we can migrate nested hypervisors between machines
were the cpu is not completly indentical.

> (need feature names for the bits, too, so you can enable or disable them  
> from the command line)

Yeah, I know. I omitted that for the first bring-up. It was planned for
a later patch.

	Joerg


  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-22 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-22 10:57 [PATCH] qemu-kvm: Ask kernel about supported svm features Joerg Roedel
2010-04-22 11:07 ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-22 12:02   ` Joerg Roedel
2010-04-22 12:13     ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-22 12:28       ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2010-04-22 14:48         ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100422122802.GA28773@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.