From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/2] add iovnl netlink support Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:12:46 +0200 Message-ID: <201004221312.46935.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20100419191807.10423.84600.stgit@savbu-pc100.cisco.com> <201004221253.11290.arnd@arndb.de> <20100422.035615.176728799.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: scofeldm@cisco.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@redhat.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:49867 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751179Ab0DVLNI (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:13:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100422.035615.176728799.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 22 April 2010, David Miller wrote: > But reading other parts of the discussion it seems that > IOV_ATTR_VF_IFNAME and some other bits will likely be > removed in the initial implementation of this stuff. That's what I suggested, yes. However, I'm still waiting for a reply from Scott wether it's actually possibly to remove it based on the way that the enic firmware works. Arnd