From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPC driver for Intel Mobile Internet Device (MID) platforms Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:06:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20100426170616.GA12769@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20100423143037.6744.87450.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20100426150934.GA9422@srcf.ucam.org> <20100426155534.6dcaca0c@linux.intel.com> <20100426154300.GA10782@srcf.ucam.org> <20100426163958.2b5f16b7@linux.intel.com> <20100426162202.GA11755@srcf.ucam.org> <20100426172800.5405f352@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:49411 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751125Ab0DZRGX (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:06:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100426172800.5405f352@linux.intel.com> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alan Cox Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sreedhara.ds@intel.com, mingo@elte.hu On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 05:28:00PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > I'm really not terribly comfortable merging enabling code for an > > architecture if there's no clear plan for merging critical parts of > > that architecture. > > I'm not interested in playing graphics driver politics. If I could do > something short term about the graphics situation I would. Furthermore > there isn't anything I can do about it (even if it does involve its > own *clean* mode setting to keep KeithP from exploding) until the > core merges are done. It's been pointed out to me that there are non-graphical targets for this platform as well, so in that case there's no real argument on my side. I'll queue this for .35. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org