From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-ioctl tree with the staging-next tree Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:14:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20100427151415.GC7653@kroah.com> References: <20100427144804.cbfa9564.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:44786 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752908Ab0D0POt (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:14:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100427144804.cbfa9564.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Vijay Kumar On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 02:48:04PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Fr=E9d=E9ric, >=20 > Today's linux-next merge of the bkl-ioctl tree got a conflict in > drivers/staging/poch/poch.c between commit > ba7d84da197c348efa2b2984a848e0fbccd4b9b0 ("Staging: Remove staging/po= ch") > from the staging-next tree and commit > 1dd97d3d546aa14db7efa5366b21d1336b91379e ("Rename 'struct > file_operations' 'ioctl' fn pointer to 'bkl_ioctl'") from the bkl-ioc= tl > tree. >=20 > The former just removed the file, so I did as well. That's the correct fix :) thanks, greg k-h