From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [RFC] ehci: Disable wake on overcurrent (WKOC_E) and disconnect (WKDISC_E)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 22:46:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201004272246.51494.linux@rainbow-software.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1004271509450.1850-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Tuesday 27 April 2010 21:21:23 Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > The previous patch was not enough as it worked only when there were no
> > USB devices connected. With a bus-powered device connected, power loss
> > causes disconnect which wakes up the machine immediately again.
>
> You said earlier that the host controller was disabled for remote
> wakeup ("/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/power/wakeup is disabled
> by default"). So even though the root hub might issue a wakeup
> request, the controller hardware should not forward that request to the
> PCI bus and it should not cause the system to wake up.
Maybe it should not - but it wakes up this board and probably also P4P800,
P4P800-E and P4C800-E at least:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/75497
> > Does anyone know why is this enabled by default?
>
> Why _what_ is enabled? Detection of disconnects? Because otherwise
> your computer wouldn't realize anything had happened when a suspended
> USB device was unplugged from a suspended root hub.
That's not disconnect detection - that's wakeup on disconnect. If I understand
EHCI 1.0 specification correctly, disconnect detection should work regardless
of the state of this bit:
| PORTSC bit 21: Wake on Disconnect Enable (WKDSCNNT_E):
| R/W. Default = 0b.
| Writing this bit to a one enables the port to be sensitive to device
| disconnects as wake-up events. See Section 4.3 for effects of this bit on
| resume event behavior. Refer to Section 4.3.1 for operational model.
And it really does. With this patch applied, system does not wake up when a
device is disconnected during suspend. When I wake up the system manually,
the disconnect is detected immediately (does not matter
> > No other USB host driver
> > (except oxu210hp-hcd which is based on EHCI) does that.
>
> Look again -- they all do. (All the HCDs that support suspend/resume,
> anyway.)
>
> > This also means that
> > suspended laptop wakes up when disconnecting a mouse?
>
> No, for the reason I described above. The controller is aware of the
> wakeup request but doesn't generate a PME# event. Likewise for desktop
> systems.
>
> > I don't have any to test
> > right now. Wakeup on USB connect makes a bit more sense but I'd say that
> > it's still not a good idea to enable it by default.
> >
> > If we don't need that, perhaps the following patch should be applied.
> >
> >
> > Disable wake on overcurrent and disconnect in EHCI.
> > This fixes immediate resume from standby on boards where port power is
> > lost in standby which triggers overcurrent detection and disconnect if a
> > bus-powered device is connected. At least Asus P4P800 boards are affected
> > when any of the USBPWxx (e.g. USBPW12) jumpers is set to 5V.
>
> Why would you want to change the jumper settings? Host controllers are
> _supposed_ to supply 5V power during system suspend.
Maybe because I don't want all my USB devices to be powered when the system is
turned off. I doubt that laptop in suspend-to-RAM (on battery) provides power
to USB ports.
--
Ondrej Zary
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-27 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-27 13:23 ehci_hcd causes immediate wakeup from suspend to RAM or disk on Asus P4P800-VM Ondrej Zary
2010-04-27 14:22 ` [PATCH] ehci: Disable wake on overcurrent (WKOC_E) Ondrej Zary
2010-04-27 14:22 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-04-27 16:25 ` [PATCH v2] [RFC] ehci: Disable wake on overcurrent (WKOC_E) and disconnect (WKDISC_E) Ondrej Zary
2010-04-27 16:25 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-04-27 19:21 ` Alan Stern
2010-04-27 20:46 ` Ondrej Zary [this message]
2010-04-27 21:33 ` Greg KH
2010-04-27 21:33 ` Greg KH
2010-04-28 15:41 ` Alan Stern
2010-04-28 15:41 ` Alan Stern
2010-04-28 17:30 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-04-29 16:16 ` Alan Stern
2010-04-29 17:45 ` Alan Stern
2010-04-29 17:45 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2010-04-29 21:14 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-04-29 21:14 ` [linux-pm] " Ondrej Zary
2010-05-04 5:37 ` Du, Alek
2010-05-04 5:37 ` Du, Alek
2010-05-05 3:12 ` Du, Alek
2010-05-05 3:12 ` [linux-pm] " Du, Alek
2010-05-05 15:55 ` Alan Stern
2010-05-05 15:55 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2010-05-06 0:11 ` Du, Alek
2010-05-06 0:11 ` [linux-pm] " Du, Alek
2010-05-06 8:23 ` Du, Alek
2010-05-06 8:23 ` [linux-pm] " Du, Alek
2010-05-06 14:46 ` Alan Stern
2010-05-06 14:46 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2010-05-06 15:20 ` Du, Alek
2010-05-06 16:06 ` Alan Stern
2010-05-07 1:32 ` Du, Alek
2010-05-07 15:20 ` Alan Stern
2010-05-08 2:00 ` Du, Alek
2010-05-08 2:00 ` [linux-pm] " Du, Alek
[not found] ` <6C44CD31806DCD4BB88546DAB7AFC9A201EB5A39FA@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2010-05-10 2:25 ` Du, Alek
2010-05-10 2:25 ` [linux-pm] " Du, Alek
2010-05-10 21:05 ` Alan Stern
2010-05-11 3:31 ` Du, Alek
2010-05-11 3:31 ` [linux-pm] " Du, Alek
2010-05-11 14:01 ` Alan Stern
2010-05-11 14:01 ` Alan Stern
2010-05-11 15:58 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2010-05-11 16:10 ` Du, Alek
2010-05-11 16:10 ` Du, Alek
2010-05-11 15:58 ` Alan Stern
2010-05-10 21:05 ` Alan Stern
2010-05-07 15:20 ` Alan Stern
2010-05-07 1:32 ` Du, Alek
2010-05-06 16:06 ` Alan Stern
2010-05-06 15:20 ` Du, Alek
2010-04-28 17:30 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-04-27 20:46 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-04-27 19:21 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201004272246.51494.linux@rainbow-software.org \
--to=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.