From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 1/2] Add netdev port-profile support (take III, was iovnl) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:37:28 +0200 Message-ID: <201004282137.28492.arnd@arndb.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@redhat.com, Jens Osterkamp To: Scott Feldman Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:56427 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752055Ab0D1Thr (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:37:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wednesday 28 April 2010, Scott Feldman wrote: > On 4/28/10 6:13 AM, "Arnd Bergmann" wrote: > > > What I could imagine to unify this is something like > > > > ip port_profile set DEVICE [ { pre_associate | pre_associate_rr } ] > > { name PORT-PROFILE | vsi MGR:VTID:VER } > > mac LLADDR > > [ vlan VID ] > > [ host_uuid HOST_UUID ] > > [ client_uuid CLIENT_UUID ] > > [ client_name CLIENT_NAME ] > > ip port_profile del DEVICE [ mac LLADDR [ vlan VID ] ] > > ip port_profile show DEVICE > > Arnd, can someone test this with VDP today? I don't have access to that > equipment so it's difficult for me to fully test the unified patch. I can > test the previous patch with enic easily because I have access to production > systems. I'd like to make sure someone can test this with VDP before I > respin the patch one more time. Sorry, but I don't have access to production hardware at this time. Jens wants to implement both sides so we can test this in simulation mode, but it's not done yet. Arnd