From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>
Cc: Abhijeet Kolekar <abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mac80211: fix paged defragmentation
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 14:02:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100503180241.GB25748@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hbmsa4bj.fsf@gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 07:49:52PM -0400, Ben Gamari wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:57:59 -0700, Abhijeet Kolekar <abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/net/mac80211/rx.c b/net/mac80211/rx.c
> > index 72efbd8..e7217e2 100644
> > --- a/net/mac80211/rx.c
> > +++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c
> > @@ -1255,6 +1255,7 @@ ieee80211_rx_h_defragment(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx)
> > if (skb_linearize(rx->skb))
> > return RX_DROP_UNUSABLE;
> >
> > + hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)rx->skb->data;
> > seq = (sc & IEEE80211_SCTL_SEQ) >> 4;
> >
> It seems to me that this might deserve a comment describing exactly why
> hdr needs to be set twice in one function. To the uninformed outsider
> the code simply seems redundant. It's unclear semantics like this that
> could cause nasty issues when someone goes back for housecleaning. Just
> a thought.
Not only that, but is there something we need to do to make sure the
compiler doesn't think it can optimize away the second assignment
of hdr?
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-03 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-30 22:57 [PATCH V2] mac80211: fix paged defragmentation Abhijeet Kolekar
2010-04-30 23:49 ` Ben Gamari
2010-05-03 18:02 ` John W. Linville [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100503180241.GB25748@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=abhijeet.kolekar@intel.com \
--cc=bgamari.foss@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.