From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754293Ab0ECJgJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2010 05:36:09 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:48435 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754152Ab0ECJgG (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2010 05:36:06 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio-net: pass gfp to add_buf Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 19:05:56 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.32-21-generic; KDE/4.4.2; i686; ; ) Cc: Amit Shah , Mark McLoughlin , Tejun Heo , Eric Van Hensbergen , Shirley Ma , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005031905.58396.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:56:42 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > virtio-net bounces buffer allocations off to > a thread if it can't allocate buffers from the atomic > pool. However, if posting buffers still requires atomic > buffers, this is unlikely to succeed. > Fix by passing in the proper gfp_t parameter. Thanks, applied with the predecessor. Cheers, Rusty.